BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 METHOD:PUBLISH PRODID:-//Tendenci - The Open Source AMS for Associations//Tendenci Codeba se MIMEDIR//EN BEGIN:VEVENT DESCRIPTION:--- This iCal file does *NOT* confirm registration.\r\nEvent d etails subject to change. ---\r\nhttps://www.spegcs.org/events/2183/\r\n\r \nEvent Title: HSE: Alternative Response Technologies\r\nStart Date / Time : Jan 22, 2013 11:30 AM America/Chicago\r\nLocation: Petroleum Club\r\nSpe aker: Mike Cortez\r\nGoogle\r\nhttp://maps.google.com/maps?q=800+Bell,Hous ton,TX,77002\r\n\r\nForecast\nhttp://www.weather.com/weather/monthly/77002 \r\n\r\nThis presentation provides an update on the progress of oil spill technology development following the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) incident in t he Gulf of Mexico during 2010. A number of new technologies were successf ully tested and implemented via the Alternative Response Technology (ART) Program. The focus of this paper is spill response offshore, near shore, a nd on-shore\; it covers technologies related to surveillance, in-situ burn ing, booming, skimming, mechanical oil/water separation, sand cleaning, an d bioremediation.\r\nMore than 123,000 individual ideas were submitted to the ART program by the public during the DWH response. These ideas fall in to two categories: source control (80,000) and spill response (43,000). Af ter screening for potential, novelty, and utility (and a number of other q ualities), ~ 100 spill response ideas were field-tested or evaluated in de tail, and at least 45 ideas were recommended for use in response operation s. Once a mere notion, these innovations are now tools in the industry&rsq uo\;s toolbox for oil spill response. \r\nTo further enhance technologies and capabilities in spill response, technology programs are being implemen ted by BP and other operators, oil spill response organizations (OSROs), a nd joint industry programs (&ldquo\;JIPs,&rdquo\; such as API, OGP, and IP IECA). Some of these programs are being conducted in collaboration with k ey government agencies, including NOAA, EPA, USCG, Environment Canada, Res earch Council of Norway, and others. As time progresses, these programs ar e merging because the participants are collaborating and communicating ext ensively.\r\nThis presentation provides an update on the progress of curre nt oil spill response technology programs and reveals early positive resul ts.--- This iCal file does *NOT* confirm registration.Event details subjec t to change. ---\r\n\r\n--- By Tendenci - The Open Source AMS for Associat ions ---\r\n UID:uid2183@spegcs.org SUMMARY:HSE: Alternative Response Technologies DTSTART:20130122T173000Z DTEND:20130122T190000Z CLASS:PUBLIC PRIORITY:5 DTSTAMP:20240328T133740Z TRANSP:OPAQUE SEQUENCE:0 LOCATION:Petroleum Club X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:
This presentation provides an update on the prog ress of oil spill technology development following the Deepwater Horizon ( DWH) incident in the Gulf of Mexico during 2010. \; A number of new te chnologies were successfully tested and implemented via the Alternative Re sponse Technology (ART) Program. The focus of this paper is spill response offshore, near shore, and on-shore\; it covers technologies related to su rveillance, in-situ burning, booming, skimming, mechanical oil/water separ ation, sand cleaning, and bioremediation.
More than 123,000 individ ual ideas were submitted to the ART program by the public during the DWH r esponse. These ideas fall into two categories: source control (80,000) and spill response (43,000). After screening for potential, novelty, and util ity (and a number of other qualities), ~ 100 spill response ideas were fie ld-tested or evaluated in detail, and at least 45 ideas were recommended f or use in response operations. Once a mere notion, these innovations are n ow tools in the industry&rsquo\;s toolbox for oil spill response. \; p>
To further enhance technologies and capabilities in spill response, technology programs are being implemented by BP and other operators, oil s pill response organizations (OSROs), and joint industry programs (&ldquo\; JIPs,&rdquo\; such as API, OGP, and IPIECA). \; Some of these programs are being conducted in collaboration with key government agencies, includ ing NOAA, EPA, USCG, Environment Canada, Research Council of Norway, and o thers. As time progresses, these programs are merging because the particip ants are collaborating and communicating extensively.
This presenta tion provides an update on the progress of current oil spill response tech nology programs and reveals early positive results.